money China Swears It Isn't Building a Time Machine
China says it definitely isn't building a time machine.
A leaked PowerPoint presentation suggests otherwise.
If the device does "prolong life," as documents claim, that's a very special case of time travel.
From the annals of “nothing to see here,” China’s largest state physics lab is insisting it’s not helping a private company build a time machine. The strange happenings are straight out of the scientist version of TMZ, with a leaked PowerPoint presentation and gossip swirling.
So: Is China’s government collaborating with a startup in order to travel through time?
➡ Join Pop Mech Pro and get exclusive answers to your weirdest science questions.
Earlier this month, unsubstantiated documents began circulating online that seemed to suggest the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of High Energy Physics is partnering with the private Ruitai Technology Development Technology on something called the "Space-time Tunnel Generation Experimental Device."
China's The Paper Journalist, which obtained a leaked PowerPoint presentation containing information about the project, has more about the device, via 6Park News:
“The device can distort time and space, control the flow rate of time, break through the barrier of time and space, and can be widely used for time travel, interstellar voyage, life extension, etc. The project plans to select a location in China, and lease an area of about 16 acres to build a scientific experiment base. It is expected that the device will be able to successfully shuttle the space-time experiment 7-12 months after the funds are in place.”
The PowerPoint also claims, per 6Park, that the team behind the project “has reached a preliminary cooperation agreement with a research and development team composed of well-known experts and academicians of the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,” and that Nobel Laureate Gao Kun “recognized and praised” the device, in addition to other esteemed scientists.
Not long after the PowerPoint document spread online, however, the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of High Energy Physics issued a statement vehemently denying its involvement in the project. Per 6Park:
“It is not true that our institute and the 'Shanxi Ruitai Technology' mentioned in the article Development Technology Co., Ltd. and its personnel have not had any contact or cooperation, and our firm will not bear any legal responsibility for any losses caused by its false propaganda.”
Even odder: The Paper Journalist discovered that Ruitai Technology has only been a company since December 31, 2020, and Nobel Laureate Gao Kun doesn't actually exist. Ruitai also denied its involvement, according to the Chongqing Morning News, claiming a financing information platform "mistakenly created the presentation."
Uh, classic misunderstanding?
⌚️ Stuff We Love: The Best Apple Watches for Every Budget
Whatever the hell actually happened here, it does beg the question: Just what would a state-funded time machine look like, anyway?
The mythical device in question, which “could prolong life by using Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity to distort space-time,” per Yicai, sure sounds like some kind of hibernation, if the “time travel” is accomplished by “prolonging life.”
In the Bible, Methuselah didn’t time travel to age 969. But the right hibernation could suspend the human body for long space journeys, for example. Like a Star Trek character, someone could wake up several centuries after they went to sleep.
But is that really time travel? It comes down to semantics. Certainly being able to pause and then resume life with a time period between fits the literal idea of traveling in time. But unlike, say, using lasers to bend spacetime, prolonging life does not extend backward in time. That’s usually a key part of any time travel schema, because traveling into the future can just seem like, well, very efficient waiting.
At the same time, it’s easy to see why hibernation time travel would be highly sought after by investors.
It does seem farfetched for a third party outside of science to make up a list of academic luminaries for a fake PowerPoint presentation. So what's really going on? The truth may only be revealed when Chinese leaders start to reach their 150th birthdays.
🎥 Now Watch This:
You Might Also Like
